Showing 25–36 of 359 articles
Automation and work: the missing conversation
Including the person doing the task in system design prevents turning experience into resistance and reduces future correction costs.
Read article
The work that disappears inside a score
Counting completed tasks can help organise a service, but evaluating a person requires understanding their assignments and their contribution to shared work. A fair review needs evidence, conversation, and the authority to change an initial judgement.
Read article
Automation: The Cultural Obstacle, Not Technical
Technical safeguards fail when daily incentives prioritize speed over understanding. The real challenge is restructuring work cultures so that human review is viable, not a penalty.
Read article
Automation: The responsibility that cannot be delegated
Even when a system decides, human responsibility remains. We examine how digital interfaces can turn suggestions into authorities and what concrete measures are needed to preserve dignity, justice, and critical review in workplace processes.
Read article
Automation and work: the transition is not equal for all
The technological transition distributes opportunities based on time, money, and job security. Analyzing who bears the real cost of adaptation allows for designing fairer and more responsible systems in work management.
Read article
Selective workplace surveillance: An invisible inequality
Workplace surveillance is not neutral. When it falls on some positions and not others, inequality is amplified. We analyze how the precision of control depends less on necessity than on workers' ability to resist, proposing a fairer and more transparent management approach.
Read article
The craft missing from the task list
Automating a procedure means choosing what counts as work. An imagined costume warehouse reveals the knowledge hidden behind a completed booking, and the working conditions needed to share that knowledge without wearing down the people who hold it.
Read article
The invisible weight of emotional labor after automation
Automating basic tasks does not eliminate human wear. By reducing volume, intensity often concentrates, demanding new forms of care, training, and organizational responsibility to protect those handling complex cases.
Read article
Speed vs. progress: The hidden trap of automation
Increasing speed can hide a backlog of repairs. We analyze how costs shift to invisible cases and what ethical guidelines should steer automation.
Read article
Automation and work: The power to decide
Automation does not just execute tasks; it sets rhythms and categories. Analyzing its impact requires reviewing who decides, how risk is assigned, and what real options remain for claiming rights when the system fails.
Read article
When the tool decides: automation and dignity
The boundary between tool and companion blurs. The conversational interface hides when it suggests, when it executes, and what data it relies on, displacing human responsibility.
Read article
Automation and work: The decision log
Traceability transforms automation. Without it, we cannot explain the failure, repair the process, or verify if the solution actually works for those who use it.
Read article