Showing 121–132 of 139 articles
What works for most people can exclude someone, before sharing with the whole community: Citizenship and networks
A community network is more useful when it notices whom it leaves out, offers alternatives, and shares care without making an exception an individual burden.
Read article
Conflict is not resolved by adding another screen, before sharing with the whole community: Citizenship and networks
A network conflict is not fixed by another screen. A community needs understandable rules, mediation, repair, and reviewable decisions to participate without undue exposure.
Read article
The exception reveals the quality of the system, before sharing with the whole community: Citizenship and networks
Exceptions show whether a network and community offer real alternatives or rules only for the usual case. A fair system retains context, repair, and routes to participation.
Read article
A useful figure can also lead us to the wrong place, before sharing with the whole community: Citizenship and networks
A metric can signal a problem, but it cannot explain a life by itself or authorise surveillance. In networks and communities, measurement needs context, limits, and alternatives.
Read article
Accepting does not always mean being able to choose, before sharing with the whole community: Citizenship and networks
Consent is meaningful only when a clear, workable alternative exists. In networks and community spaces, accepting must not be the price of belonging.
Read article
The first question must come before the tool, before sharing with the whole community: Citizenship and networks
A community tool becomes meaningful when the public question comes before the platform: it defines what is shared, who decides, and how harm is repaired.
Read article
Participation changes the question and improves the answer when an app requests information: Privacy and data
Participation turns a data request into a checkable conversation: it shows which problem exists, which alternative works, and which information need not be collected.
Read article
Participation changes the question and improves the answer around an automatic response: Everyday artificial intelligence
Participation turns an automatic response into a service that can be corrected: it makes room to identify errors, add context, and decide what improves without shifting every burden to the recipient.
Read article
Participation changes the question and improves the answer: Screens and attention
Participation reveals what a screen demands from attention and lets decisions be corrected before everyday friction becomes exclusion.
Read article
Participation changes the question and improves the answer — when the group needs to care for itself: Digital coexistence
Meaningful participation by young people and families turns digital rules into understandable, reviewable, and more protective agreements.
Read article
The first question must arrive before the tool — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
Before adopting a tool, a group can agree how it will protect participation, privacy and repair after harm.
Read article
Technology that needs more democracy: The digital rights we use without naming them
How participation, audits and remedy help technology respect rights.
Read article