Showing 37–48 of 238 articles
The digital fraud that speaks like us: the human side of automated decisions
An anti-fraud decision can cause real harm. Reducing fraud does not justify treating each alert as an irreversible verdict, but rather requires reviewing the human impact and paths for repair.
Read article
Fraud does not begin with blaming the victim
Blaming the victim protects the wrong design. Today's sophistication can fool anyone at the right time.
Read article
Before we pay, the screen should explain what has changed
A familiar invoice can carry unfamiliar bank details. An imaginary example explores how to design a useful pause before payment, without placing the entire burden on the person whose finger is already hovering over the confirmation button.
Read article
Fraud that crosses organizational boundaries
An attacker exploits organizational boundaries while victims receive isolated responses. Effective defense requires coordination, shared evidence, and genuine human oversight.
Read article
Digital fraud: when conversation feels credible
AI makes it easy to personalize fraudulent context, yet it does not remove signals of broken procedure. We analyze how to protect trust without relying on human heroism, measuring the real impact of these tools on our daily decisions.
Read article
Digital fraud that simulates humanity
Fraudsters now use borrowed faces and voices. Audiovisual appearance reduces doubt, yet urgency and exclusivity prevent the verification needed to act with sound judgment.
Read article
Cloned voices: when trust can be imitated
A familiar voice no longer proves identity. Accessible cloning exploits trust and haste, a family's natural defenses, to alter concrete decisions and dependencies.
Read article
Cybersecurity: the question of how much service we can afford to lose
Shifting the focus from tools to operational resilience enables clear, verifiable, and human decisions about acceptable risk in real-world organizations.
Read article
Cybersecurity: The conversation that deserves time
Discussing gaps is protection. This reflection transforms security dialogue, moving from abstract tools to verifiable decisions and shared human responsibility.
Read article
Cybersecurity: What a Screen Should Not Decide
Beyond tools, security demands discernment. This article explores how automated blocking and access decisions require human context, proportionality, and clear review mechanisms to protect without breeding distrust.
Read article
Cultural cybersecurity: the problem isn't technical
Security isn't just about tools; it's about daily habits. Analyzing small exceptions allows us to transform fear into verifiable, responsible decisions.
Read article
Cybersecurity: The responsibility you cannot delegate
Responsibility is not outsourced. It shifts a conversation often limited to tools, focusing on who decides, how they respond, and what is learned when the system fails.
Read article