Showing 13–24 of 26 articles
Supervision requires the power to stop and correct — when learning matters more than completion: Learning and technology
Effective human oversight in education requires real authority to stop, review, correct, and repair automated decisions that harm people.
Read article
Participation changes the question and improves the answer around an automatic response: Everyday artificial intelligence
Participation turns an automatic response into a service that can be corrected: it makes room to identify errors, add context, and decide what improves without shifting every burden to the recipient.
Read article
Supervision requires the power to stop and correct an automatic response: Everyday artificial intelligence
Supervising AI is not watching a screen: it requires authority to stop a response, correct its effects, and explain the change to affected people.
Read article
After launch, the important work begins — before an automatic response: Everyday artificial intelligence
Launching an AI tool does not close a project: it starts error observation, support for affected people, and verifiable improvement of every automatic response.
Read article
Safety begins when reporting an error is possible — before an automatic response: Everyday artificial intelligence
The safety of an automatic response depends on errors being reportable, correctable, and explainable without punishment. Everyday AI needs clear channels, human oversight, and repair.
Read article
What works for most people can exclude someone — before an automatic response: Everyday artificial intelligence
An automatic response designed for the majority case can leave out people who write differently, need more time, or do not fit its assumptions. Everyday AI requires alternatives and human review.
Read article
What works for most people can exclude someone — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
A seemingly neutral digital rule can shut out someone who needs more time, another channel, or a different way to participate. Alternatives, consultation, and repair make coexistence genuinely shared.
Read article
A useful number can still lead us to the wrong place — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
An indicator can guide a conversation, but it cannot decide on its own what a group needs. Context, privacy, and responsible interpretation better protect digital coexistence.
Read article
The myth that makes the debate harder: The digital rights we use without naming
A guide to dismantling the false choice between convenience, privacy and individual responsibility in digital services.
Read article
A useful idea for understanding the present: The digital rights we use without naming
A practical guide to observing data, decisions, consent and remedy in everyday digital life.
Read article
The signal we should not ignore: The digital rights we use without naming
Signals of opacity and missing remedies help protect children digital rights.
Read article
What we are giving up for speed: The digital rights we use without naming
Digital speed should not hide the data, choices and remedies surrendered for convenience.
Read article