Showing 1–10 of 10 articles
Time Turns a Temporary Solution into Something Else — the body no dashboard can summarise: Sport, body and data
In measured sport, a useful workaround can acquire authority without ever being designed to last. Cases from training, competition, and monitoring show how to give every temporary solution a date, limits, and review.
Read article
Power Appears Where Someone Can Say Stop — the body no dashboard can summarise: Sport, body and data
In measured sport, an effective right to stop separates participation from obedience. Cases from training, competition, and technology show how consent, safety, and review can place real limits on power.
Read article
The Exception Does Not Break the Rule: It Explains It — the body no dashboard can summarise: Sport, body and data
A sporting exception is not noise to erase but a test of a rule's boundaries. Cases from racing, recovery, and classification show how to investigate differences without diagnosing, punishing, or turning an average into destiny.
Read article
When Better Measurement Means Looking Beyond a Single Number — the body no dashboard can summarise: Sport, body and data
Better measurement is not the accumulation of decimals but the comparison of signals, explicit uncertainty, and restored bodily context. Three cases show how one number can distort workload, performance, and wellbeing, while safer decisions combine evidence, consent, and professional judgement.
Read article
The Minute a Decision Stops Being Abstract — the body no dashboard can summarise: Sport, body and data
A sports metric can look neutral until it changes selection, adds workload, restricts rest, or exposes bodily information. At that moment, the quality of the decision depends on context, consent, professional boundaries, and a genuine route to review or stop its effects.
Read article
The Invisible Question That Changes Everything — the body no dashboard can summarise: Sport, body and data
Sports data becomes more useful when someone asks what it means for that person, at that moment, in that context. No dashboard can integrate sensation, consent, environment, identity, and purpose by itself; interpretation requires conversation, restraint, and the power to stop.
Read article
Power Appears Where Someone Can Say Enough — the home as the first laboratory of digital citizenship: Families in a connected world
Digital citizenship begins when any household member can stop a connected practice, ask for reasons, and be heard without fear. A legitimate boundary protects rights, distributes responsibility, and keeps a route to review and repair open.
Read article
The Minute When a Decision Stops Being Abstract — the home as the first laboratory of digital citizenship: Families in a connected world
Digital citizenship becomes concrete in one minute: when someone decides whether to post, reply, accept a permission, or ask for help. The home can turn that instant into learning through a brief pause, shared questions, proportionate responsibilities, and a possible route to repair.
Read article
Accepting does not always mean being able to choose — before an automatic answer: Everyday artificial intelligence
Accepting an automatic answer does not, by itself, show that a free and informed choice was available. A suggestion from an assistant, a classification on a screen, or an answer generated during an application can arrive
Read article
Accepting does not always mean being able to choose — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
A click, silence, or remaining in a chat does not by itself prove a free choice. Digital coexistence needs agreements that reduce pressure, repair harm and protect minors.
Read article