Showing 409–420 of 441 articles
Accepting does not always mean having been able to choose — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
A click, a signature, or silence in front of a platform does not by itself demonstrate an informed choice when design competes for attention.
Read article
The first question must arrive before the tool — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
Before installing a filter, issuing tablets, or banning a phone, the useful question protects attention without turning it into surveillance.
Read article
Care also means not watching everything — when the group needs to care for itself: Digital coexistence
Privacy makes it possible to ask for help, learn boundaries, and build trust among young people, families, and schools.
Read article
Supervision requires the power to stop and correct — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
Supervising a rule or platform is not watching more: it is being able to interrupt harm, correct a decision, and repair trust through clear limits and shared responsibility.
Read article
A rumour travels fast when it tries to care — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
A warning meant to protect can become a rumour that exposes and isolates. Calm verification, limited sharing, and repair with those harmed make care real.
Read article
Conflict is not solved by adding another screen — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
When digital conflict arises, adding channels, forms, or surveillance can magnify harm. Protected conversation, mediation, and clear technology boundaries restore the group’s capacity to care.
Read article
Accepting does not always mean being able to choose — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
A click, silence, or remaining in a chat does not by itself prove a free choice. Digital coexistence needs agreements that reduce pressure, repair harm and protect minors.
Read article
The first question must arrive before the tool — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
Before adopting a tool, a group can agree how it will protect participation, privacy and repair after harm.
Read article
What remains after the excitement: The digital rights we use without naming them
Digital rights are exercised in ordinary choices: asking for explanations, limiting data and finding redress.
Read article
When convenience starts to cost too much: The digital rights we use without naming them
An app's convenience can hide trade-offs involving data, time and choice. Recognising them helps families choose more carefully.
Read article
The question one company cannot answer alone: The digital rights we use without naming them
Why protecting children online requires public rules, independent oversight and real ways to complain.
Read article
The quiet change already under way: The digital rights used without naming them
How to recognise gradual changes in digital services, keep evidence, and complain calmly when children are affected.
Read article