Reflections & stories
Ideas, experiences and learnings about education, technology and coexistence.
Showing 1609–1620 of 1,735 articles

Safety begins when an error can be reported: Screens and attention
Screen safety does not depend only on blocking risks: it depends on an error being reportable, reviewable, and correctable without punishing the person who notices it.
Read article
What works for most people can exclude someone — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
A journey that serves most people can leave someone out when it offers no time, alternatives, or repair.
Read article
A rumour travels fast when it tries to care — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
A rumour that promises care can gain speed on a screen while losing context, consent, and repair.
Read article
Conflict is not resolved by adding another screen — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
When conflict appears, adding a form, chat, or alert can divide attention and hide the decision that needs to be made.
Read article
The exception reveals the quality of the system — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
The exception is not an inconvenience to hide: it shows whether a digital system preserves time, understanding, and a dignified way forward for every person.
Read article
A useful number can also lead us to the wrong place — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
A metric can guide decisions about screens, but without context it can also conceal pressures, inequalities, and needs that do not fit inside a number.
Read article
Accepting does not always mean having been able to choose — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
A click, a signature, or silence in front of a platform does not by itself demonstrate an informed choice when design competes for attention.
Read article
The first question must arrive before the tool — when attention is at stake: Screens and attention
Before installing a filter, issuing tablets, or banning a phone, the useful question protects attention without turning it into surveillance.
Read article
Participation changes the question and improves the answer — when the group needs to care for itself: Digital coexistence
Meaningful participation by young people and families turns digital rules into understandable, reviewable, and more protective agreements.
Read article
Care also means not watching everything — when the group needs to care for itself: Digital coexistence
Privacy makes it possible to ask for help, learn boundaries, and build trust among young people, families, and schools.
Read article
Supervision requires the power to stop and correct — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
Supervising a rule or platform is not watching more: it is being able to interrupt harm, correct a decision, and repair trust through clear limits and shared responsibility.
Read article
After the launch, the important work begins — when the group needs care: Digital coexistence
A rule, app, or coexistence agreement is not finished when it is launched. Listening to real use, correcting obstacles, and repairing harm turn it into everyday care for families, schools, and young people.
Read article